Background: In patients with Hodgkin's disease, the use of gallium-67 scintigraphy (Ga-67) compared to conventional staging and restaging techniques is still controversial. In particular, in a combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy given in sequence, its role in detecting active disease after chemotherapy map be useful in planning the subsequent radiotherapeutic strategy. Patients and methods: From March 1990 to September 1994, 125 patients with previously untreated histologically proven Hodgkin's disease were enrolled in two different prospective trials according to clinical stage. Staging procedures included Ga-67, chest-abdominal computed tomography (CT), and/or magnetic resonance (MR). All three tests were performed in 53 patients at staging and in 47 at restaging. Results of Ga-67 at staging were compared to conventional procedures or pathological findings. Results of Ga-67, CT scan, and MR at restaging were compared to disease outcome during the follow-up. Finally a cost/benefit ratio for each test was determined. Results: At staging, Ga-67 showed lower sensitivity than CT and MR (90 vs. 96 and 100%, respectively) because of the number of false-negative images. Nevertheless, by using both CT and Ga-67 scan, the sensitivity is equal to that observed with MR (100%). At restaging, Ga-67 is superior to CT scan and equivalent to MR in detecting true negative patients (specificity: 98% vs. 45% vs. 92%). Conclusions: As a single technique, Ga-67 scan cannot substitute for CT scan or MR in staging patients with Hodgkin's disease. Nevertheless, Ga-67 scan has an important role in defining complete remission after treatment and therefore in planning subsequent treatment. Considering the lower costs of CT scan plus Ga-67 ($320) versus MR alone ($810), the two tests may be considered procedures of choice in staging as well as in restaging patients with Hodgkin's disease.
Comparison of gallium scan, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance in patients with mediastinal Hodgkin's disease
Santoro A;
1997-01-01
Abstract
Background: In patients with Hodgkin's disease, the use of gallium-67 scintigraphy (Ga-67) compared to conventional staging and restaging techniques is still controversial. In particular, in a combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy given in sequence, its role in detecting active disease after chemotherapy map be useful in planning the subsequent radiotherapeutic strategy. Patients and methods: From March 1990 to September 1994, 125 patients with previously untreated histologically proven Hodgkin's disease were enrolled in two different prospective trials according to clinical stage. Staging procedures included Ga-67, chest-abdominal computed tomography (CT), and/or magnetic resonance (MR). All three tests were performed in 53 patients at staging and in 47 at restaging. Results of Ga-67 at staging were compared to conventional procedures or pathological findings. Results of Ga-67, CT scan, and MR at restaging were compared to disease outcome during the follow-up. Finally a cost/benefit ratio for each test was determined. Results: At staging, Ga-67 showed lower sensitivity than CT and MR (90 vs. 96 and 100%, respectively) because of the number of false-negative images. Nevertheless, by using both CT and Ga-67 scan, the sensitivity is equal to that observed with MR (100%). At restaging, Ga-67 is superior to CT scan and equivalent to MR in detecting true negative patients (specificity: 98% vs. 45% vs. 92%). Conclusions: As a single technique, Ga-67 scan cannot substitute for CT scan or MR in staging patients with Hodgkin's disease. Nevertheless, Ga-67 scan has an important role in defining complete remission after treatment and therefore in planning subsequent treatment. Considering the lower costs of CT scan plus Ga-67 ($320) versus MR alone ($810), the two tests may be considered procedures of choice in staging as well as in restaging patients with Hodgkin's disease.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
