The ideal follow-up program for anal canal cancer remains unclear and controversial. We hereby describe an extensive follow-up program for anal canal carcinoma in order to evaluate which examinations and which diagnostic techniques really had impact on survival and management. We evaluated 25 patients with anal canal carcinoma. Local excision (LE) was performed in 5 patients, radiochemotherapy (RCT) in 13, radiochemotherapy and local excision (RCTE) in 7. Mean follow-up time was 6.3 years (range 20 months-ii years). The follow-up program included clinical examination, serum tumor markers evaluation, transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), anoscopy with either mucosal or by Tru-cut needle multiple biopsies, standard chest X-ray and hepatic-inguinal ultrasonography, endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and in some cases total-body skeletal scintigraphy. A large multicentered randomized and prospective trial is surely lacking and should be undertaken as soon as possible. Our results suggest that an effective local control, rather than a higher survival is the reachable goal at present for anal canal carcinomas. However, further steps should be made to achieve better results. After this experience we propose a more semplified follow-up protocol which consists in performing only rectal examination, endoscopy, Tru-cut needle biopsies and TRUS for local control and inguinal ultrasound and TC to evidence distant metastases.

Analysis of a follow-up program for anal canal carcinoma

LAGHI, ANDREA
2001-01-01

Abstract

The ideal follow-up program for anal canal cancer remains unclear and controversial. We hereby describe an extensive follow-up program for anal canal carcinoma in order to evaluate which examinations and which diagnostic techniques really had impact on survival and management. We evaluated 25 patients with anal canal carcinoma. Local excision (LE) was performed in 5 patients, radiochemotherapy (RCT) in 13, radiochemotherapy and local excision (RCTE) in 7. Mean follow-up time was 6.3 years (range 20 months-ii years). The follow-up program included clinical examination, serum tumor markers evaluation, transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), anoscopy with either mucosal or by Tru-cut needle multiple biopsies, standard chest X-ray and hepatic-inguinal ultrasonography, endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and in some cases total-body skeletal scintigraphy. A large multicentered randomized and prospective trial is surely lacking and should be undertaken as soon as possible. Our results suggest that an effective local control, rather than a higher survival is the reachable goal at present for anal canal carcinomas. However, further steps should be made to achieve better results. After this experience we propose a more semplified follow-up protocol which consists in performing only rectal examination, endoscopy, Tru-cut needle biopsies and TRUS for local control and inguinal ultrasound and TC to evidence distant metastases.
2001
aged
anal canal
anal carcinoma
anus neoplasms
biopsy
carcinoma: squamous cell
combined modality therapy
computed tomography
diagnosis: differential
female
follow-up studies
humans
magnetic resonance
magnetic resonance imaging
male
metastasis
middle aged
recurrence
sensitivity and specificity
serum tumor markers
tomography: x-ray computed
tru-cut
tumor markers: biological
ultrasonography
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11699/100937
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact