Background: Parkinson's disease patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) at standard frequency (>100 Hz) often develop gait impairment, postural instability and speech difficulties. Low frequency stimulation (<100 Hz, LFS) can improve such axial symptoms, but there are concerns that improvement may be transient. Objective: To identify long-term outcome and predictors of low-frequency subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Methods: Through a chart review we identified 85 out of 324 STN DBS patients who received a trial of LFS and describe their characteristics and outcome predictors. Results: Patients were switched to LFS (<100 Hz) 3.8 +/- 3.3 years after surgery. Most patients (64%) attained a subjective improvement of gait, speech or balance for 2.0 +/- 1.9 years. Motor scores improved within the first year after the stimulation change and showed a slower progression over time when compared to patients switched back to high frequency stimulation. UPDRS III axial score on medication before surgery and the y-axis coordinate of the active contact were independent predictors of LFS retention. Conclusions: This report provides evidence that the use of LFS yields an enduring benefit in a considerable percentage of patients who develop axial motor symptoms during conventional stimulation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Low-frequency Subthalamic Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Longterm Outcome and Predictors
Fasano A
2016-01-01
Abstract
Background: Parkinson's disease patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) at standard frequency (>100 Hz) often develop gait impairment, postural instability and speech difficulties. Low frequency stimulation (<100 Hz, LFS) can improve such axial symptoms, but there are concerns that improvement may be transient. Objective: To identify long-term outcome and predictors of low-frequency subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Methods: Through a chart review we identified 85 out of 324 STN DBS patients who received a trial of LFS and describe their characteristics and outcome predictors. Results: Patients were switched to LFS (<100 Hz) 3.8 +/- 3.3 years after surgery. Most patients (64%) attained a subjective improvement of gait, speech or balance for 2.0 +/- 1.9 years. Motor scores improved within the first year after the stimulation change and showed a slower progression over time when compared to patients switched back to high frequency stimulation. UPDRS III axial score on medication before surgery and the y-axis coordinate of the active contact were independent predictors of LFS retention. Conclusions: This report provides evidence that the use of LFS yields an enduring benefit in a considerable percentage of patients who develop axial motor symptoms during conventional stimulation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


