Interpretative comments in the laboratory reports can improve the quality of diagnostic information. The complete blood count with differential (CBC-diff) is one of the hematology laboratory tests with demonstrated clinical usefulness. CBC-diff may include a peripheral blood smear if numerical or morphological review criteria are fulfilled. As such, hematologists need specific skill for interpreting and conveying the diagnostic information to clinicians by using adequate communication approaches. A survey carried out by the SIBioC Diagnostic Hematology Study Group (GdS-DE) showed a heterogeneous situation about the use of the hematological interpretative comments. In each laboratory, different descriptions were used even for the same cell abnormalities. Moreover, some laboratories omit to report relevant morphological abnormalities, such as activated or atypical lymphocytes as well as immature granulocytes, which are often necessary for the diagnosis. Therefore, the GdS-DE has decided to select appropriate comments and to propose a standardized reporting system. First, 423 comments from 13 laboratories were analyzed. These comments were revised with the purpose of: a) reducing the number, b) standardizing the language, c) providing an information in a format that could be easily understood by patients and clinicians, and d) increasing the quality of clinical information. The GdS-DE decided to provide written information for both physicians and patients or for physician's use only. The former is represented by 59 comments using a simple and not frightening language, whereas the latter is a letter for the physician in which more specific information is provided.

Interpretative comments in the laboratory hematology report

Da Rin G;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Interpretative comments in the laboratory reports can improve the quality of diagnostic information. The complete blood count with differential (CBC-diff) is one of the hematology laboratory tests with demonstrated clinical usefulness. CBC-diff may include a peripheral blood smear if numerical or morphological review criteria are fulfilled. As such, hematologists need specific skill for interpreting and conveying the diagnostic information to clinicians by using adequate communication approaches. A survey carried out by the SIBioC Diagnostic Hematology Study Group (GdS-DE) showed a heterogeneous situation about the use of the hematological interpretative comments. In each laboratory, different descriptions were used even for the same cell abnormalities. Moreover, some laboratories omit to report relevant morphological abnormalities, such as activated or atypical lymphocytes as well as immature granulocytes, which are often necessary for the diagnosis. Therefore, the GdS-DE has decided to select appropriate comments and to propose a standardized reporting system. First, 423 comments from 13 laboratories were analyzed. These comments were revised with the purpose of: a) reducing the number, b) standardizing the language, c) providing an information in a format that could be easily understood by patients and clinicians, and d) increasing the quality of clinical information. The GdS-DE decided to provide written information for both physicians and patients or for physician's use only. The former is represented by 59 comments using a simple and not frightening language, whereas the latter is a letter for the physician in which more specific information is provided.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11699/104160
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact