IntroductionVideocapsule endoscopy (VCE) may be a complementary tool in the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) in cases with equivocal findings and in the follow-up of complicated cases. We aimed to summarize the literature on the utilization of VCE in CD diagnosis/follow-up.MethodsA computerized literature search was performed to identify pertinent articles published between January 2010 and January 2024.ResultsThree studies focused on VCE in diagnosing CD, involving a total of 186 patients. VCE was performed due to small bowel atrophy with negative serology (19 patients), positive serology with negative histology (40 patients), contraindications/refusal to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy (6 patients), high clinical suspicion of CD despite negative serology and/or small bowel atrophy (99 patients), research purpose (22 patients). Twenty studies focused on the follow-up, involving a total of 1337 patients. VCE was performed due to positive serology despite GFD (64 patients), persistent symptoms (389 patients), known/suspected refractory CD-RCD (448 patients), not specified (436 patients). VCE revealed RCD in 243 patients, ulcerative jejunoileitis in 32, T-cell lymphoma in 18, small bowel tumor in one.ConclusionsVCE may play a role in patients with equivocal CD diagnosis and in those with suspected complications, particularly RCD. Further studies are warranted to draw more solid conclusions.
The role of videocapsule endoscopy in the diagnosis and follow-up of celiac disease: a scoping review
Rossi, Roberta Elisa;Hassan, Cesare;Repici, Alessandro
2024-01-01
Abstract
IntroductionVideocapsule endoscopy (VCE) may be a complementary tool in the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) in cases with equivocal findings and in the follow-up of complicated cases. We aimed to summarize the literature on the utilization of VCE in CD diagnosis/follow-up.MethodsA computerized literature search was performed to identify pertinent articles published between January 2010 and January 2024.ResultsThree studies focused on VCE in diagnosing CD, involving a total of 186 patients. VCE was performed due to small bowel atrophy with negative serology (19 patients), positive serology with negative histology (40 patients), contraindications/refusal to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy (6 patients), high clinical suspicion of CD despite negative serology and/or small bowel atrophy (99 patients), research purpose (22 patients). Twenty studies focused on the follow-up, involving a total of 1337 patients. VCE was performed due to positive serology despite GFD (64 patients), persistent symptoms (389 patients), known/suspected refractory CD-RCD (448 patients), not specified (436 patients). VCE revealed RCD in 243 patients, ulcerative jejunoileitis in 32, T-cell lymphoma in 18, small bowel tumor in one.ConclusionsVCE may play a role in patients with equivocal CD diagnosis and in those with suspected complications, particularly RCD. Further studies are warranted to draw more solid conclusions.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


