Objective: To assess the efficacy of adjuvant MMC in the endoscopic treatment of airway stenoses. Data sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Review methods: A literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The PICOS tool was used to determine the eligibility criteria for this study. A single arm meta-analysis was performed for stenosis resolution, the rate of patients requiring multiple endoscopic procedures, and the rate of patients requiring other surgical treatments. Results: A total number of 358 patients (median age: 48.0years; 95% CI 44.8-50.8) were included. The median follow-up was 25.2 months (n = 244/358; 95% CI 15.4-38.3). Overall, the cumulative stenosis resolution rate was 76.37% (n = 187/254; 95% CI 59.72-89.64), the rate of patients requiring multiple endoscopic procedures was 52.33% (n = 131/260; 95% CI 32.03-72.25), and the rate of patients requiring other surgical treatments was 4.08% (n = 26/310; 95% CI 0.37-11.48). The median intervention-free interval was 366 days (n = 155/358; 95% CI 270-696). Conclusions: Current evidence does not allow definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of adjuvant MMC in reducing recurrence or prolonging intervention-free intervals in airway stenosis. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of MMC and to inform evidence-based guidelines for patient selection and treatment use. Level of evidence: NA.

Mitomycin C in the Endoscopic Treatment of Airway Stenosis: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Mangiameli, Giuseppe;Alloisio, Marco;Spriano, Giuseppe;Marulli, Giuseppe;De Virgilio, Armando
2026-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of adjuvant MMC in the endoscopic treatment of airway stenoses. Data sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Review methods: A literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The PICOS tool was used to determine the eligibility criteria for this study. A single arm meta-analysis was performed for stenosis resolution, the rate of patients requiring multiple endoscopic procedures, and the rate of patients requiring other surgical treatments. Results: A total number of 358 patients (median age: 48.0years; 95% CI 44.8-50.8) were included. The median follow-up was 25.2 months (n = 244/358; 95% CI 15.4-38.3). Overall, the cumulative stenosis resolution rate was 76.37% (n = 187/254; 95% CI 59.72-89.64), the rate of patients requiring multiple endoscopic procedures was 52.33% (n = 131/260; 95% CI 32.03-72.25), and the rate of patients requiring other surgical treatments was 4.08% (n = 26/310; 95% CI 0.37-11.48). The median intervention-free interval was 366 days (n = 155/358; 95% CI 270-696). Conclusions: Current evidence does not allow definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of adjuvant MMC in reducing recurrence or prolonging intervention-free intervals in airway stenosis. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of MMC and to inform evidence-based guidelines for patient selection and treatment use. Level of evidence: NA.
2026
airway stenosis
endoscopic treatment
laryngotracheal stenosis
mitomycin C
subglottic stenosis
tracheal stenosis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11699/108163
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact