The impact of KRAS mutations on cetuximab sensitivity in epidermal growth factor receptor fluorescence in situ hybridisation-positive ( EGFR FISH+) metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC) has not been previously investigated. In the present study, we analysed KRAS, BRAF, P13KCA, MET, and IGF1R in 85 mCRC treated with cetuximab-based therapy in whom EGFR status was known. KRAS mutations (52.5%) negatively affected response only in EGFR FISH + patients. EGFR FISH+/KRAS mutated had a significantly lower response rate (P=0.04) than EGFR FISH+/KRAS wild type patients. Four EGFR FISH + patients with KRAS mutations responded to cetuximab therapy. BRAF was mutated in 5.0% of patients and none responded to the therapy. P13KCA mutations (17.7%) were not associated to cetuximab sensitivity. Patients overexpressing IGF1R (74.3%) had significantly longer survival than patients with low IGF1R expression (P=0.006), with no difference in response rate. IGF1R gene amplification was not detected, and only two (2.6%) patients, both responders, had MET gene amplification. In conclusion, KRAS mutations are associated with cetuximab failure in EGFR FISH+ mCRC, even if it does not preclude response. The rarity of MET and IGF1R gene amplification suggests a marginal role inprimary resistance. The potential prognostic implication of IGF1R expression merits further evaluation. OI Tallini, Giovanni/0000-0003-0113-6682; di tommaso, luca/0000-0002-9013-4728; Roncalli, Massimo/0000-0002-7901-8910

Primary resistance to cetuximab therapy in EGFR FISH-positive colorectal cancer patients

Rimassa L;Di Tommaso L;Roncalli M;Santoro A;
2008-01-01

Abstract

The impact of KRAS mutations on cetuximab sensitivity in epidermal growth factor receptor fluorescence in situ hybridisation-positive ( EGFR FISH+) metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC) has not been previously investigated. In the present study, we analysed KRAS, BRAF, P13KCA, MET, and IGF1R in 85 mCRC treated with cetuximab-based therapy in whom EGFR status was known. KRAS mutations (52.5%) negatively affected response only in EGFR FISH + patients. EGFR FISH+/KRAS mutated had a significantly lower response rate (P=0.04) than EGFR FISH+/KRAS wild type patients. Four EGFR FISH + patients with KRAS mutations responded to cetuximab therapy. BRAF was mutated in 5.0% of patients and none responded to the therapy. P13KCA mutations (17.7%) were not associated to cetuximab sensitivity. Patients overexpressing IGF1R (74.3%) had significantly longer survival than patients with low IGF1R expression (P=0.006), with no difference in response rate. IGF1R gene amplification was not detected, and only two (2.6%) patients, both responders, had MET gene amplification. In conclusion, KRAS mutations are associated with cetuximab failure in EGFR FISH+ mCRC, even if it does not preclude response. The rarity of MET and IGF1R gene amplification suggests a marginal role inprimary resistance. The potential prognostic implication of IGF1R expression merits further evaluation. OI Tallini, Giovanni/0000-0003-0113-6682; di tommaso, luca/0000-0002-9013-4728; Roncalli, Massimo/0000-0002-7901-8910
2008
Antibodies; Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Resistance; Neoplasm; Female; Humans; In Situ Hybridization; Fluorescence; Male; Middle Aged; Nuclear Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met; Receptor; Epidermal Growth Factor; Receptors; Growth Factor; Somatomedin; Transcription Factors; ras Proteins
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
aa.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 177.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
177.01 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11699/12436
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 165
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 143
social impact