To quantify the influence of Single-Bundle with Lateral Plasty and Double-Bundle reconstruction on static and dynamic laxity in combined ACL- and ALL-deficient knees.The study included 10 fresh-frozen human knees. The joints were analyzed in the following conditions: ACL + ALL resection, Single-Bundle with Lateral Plasty (SBLP) reconstruction, Double-Bundle (DB) reconstruction. Testing parameters were: anterior displacement at 30A degrees and 90A degrees of flexion (AP30, AP90) applying a manual maximum load; internal rotation at 30A degrees and 90A degrees of flexion (INT30, INT90) applying a 5 Nm torque and acceleration and internal rotation Pivot-Shift (PS) test. Kinematics was acquired by a navigation system. Paired Student's t test was conducted to assess statistical difference (P < 0.05).At both 30A degrees and 90A degrees of knee flexion, both SBLP and DB surgical techniques showed a significant reduction (P < 0.01) of anterior-posterior tibial displacement compared to the resection of ACL + ALL. At 30A degrees on knee flexion it is the SBLP that allows the greatest reduction of internal rotational laxity when compared to DB reconstruction. Concerning the PS test, only SBPL procedure had a significant laxity decrease considering the acceleration reached by the joint when compared with the ACL + ALL state (P < 0.01).Clinical relevance of this study is that the internal rotation and PS test were more efficiently controlled by the SBLP technique than by the DB one at both 30A degrees and 90A degrees of flexion in case of ACL + ALL lesions.
Kinematics of ACL and anterolateral ligament. Part II: anterolateral and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Bonanzinga, T;Marcacci, M;
2017-01-01
Abstract
To quantify the influence of Single-Bundle with Lateral Plasty and Double-Bundle reconstruction on static and dynamic laxity in combined ACL- and ALL-deficient knees.The study included 10 fresh-frozen human knees. The joints were analyzed in the following conditions: ACL + ALL resection, Single-Bundle with Lateral Plasty (SBLP) reconstruction, Double-Bundle (DB) reconstruction. Testing parameters were: anterior displacement at 30A degrees and 90A degrees of flexion (AP30, AP90) applying a manual maximum load; internal rotation at 30A degrees and 90A degrees of flexion (INT30, INT90) applying a 5 Nm torque and acceleration and internal rotation Pivot-Shift (PS) test. Kinematics was acquired by a navigation system. Paired Student's t test was conducted to assess statistical difference (P < 0.05).At both 30A degrees and 90A degrees of knee flexion, both SBLP and DB surgical techniques showed a significant reduction (P < 0.01) of anterior-posterior tibial displacement compared to the resection of ACL + ALL. At 30A degrees on knee flexion it is the SBLP that allows the greatest reduction of internal rotational laxity when compared to DB reconstruction. Concerning the PS test, only SBPL procedure had a significant laxity decrease considering the acceleration reached by the joint when compared with the ACL + ALL state (P < 0.01).Clinical relevance of this study is that the internal rotation and PS test were more efficiently controlled by the SBLP technique than by the DB one at both 30A degrees and 90A degrees of flexion in case of ACL + ALL lesions.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.