PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a combined ablation of the steep and fiat meridian to correct astigmatism with the excimer laser. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes with myopic, mixed, or hyperopic astigmatism (mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction -4.30 ± 4.70 D [range, -12.50 to +1.50 D] and mean preoperative cylinder magnitude -3.40 ± 1.40 D [range, -1.50 to -6.00 D]) underwent PRK with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. The surgical strategy involved ablating half the amount of the cylinder (in diopters) along steepest meridian, the other half in a subsequent step along the flattest meridian; thereafter, the spherical equivalent was corrected. RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.07 ± 0.87 D and mean cylinder was -0.44 ± 0.36 D. Mean spectacle- corrected visual acuity was 0.86 ± 0.13 compared to 0.75 ± 0.22 preoperatively. Mean corneal haze was 0.67 ± 0.31. No patient lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity and there were no complaints about night halos or glare. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike other ablation strategies, the cross-cylinder method creates a smooth transition (low dioptric gradient) between the treated and untreated cornea. This is achieved by first treating the cylinder and making the corneal surface spherical and then ablating the spherical component of the refractive error.

Photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopic or hyperopic astigmatism with a cross-cylinder ablation

Vinciguerra P;
1999

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a combined ablation of the steep and fiat meridian to correct astigmatism with the excimer laser. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes with myopic, mixed, or hyperopic astigmatism (mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction -4.30 ± 4.70 D [range, -12.50 to +1.50 D] and mean preoperative cylinder magnitude -3.40 ± 1.40 D [range, -1.50 to -6.00 D]) underwent PRK with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. The surgical strategy involved ablating half the amount of the cylinder (in diopters) along steepest meridian, the other half in a subsequent step along the flattest meridian; thereafter, the spherical equivalent was corrected. RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.07 ± 0.87 D and mean cylinder was -0.44 ± 0.36 D. Mean spectacle- corrected visual acuity was 0.86 ± 0.13 compared to 0.75 ± 0.22 preoperatively. Mean corneal haze was 0.67 ± 0.31. No patient lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity and there were no complaints about night halos or glare. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike other ablation strategies, the cross-cylinder method creates a smooth transition (low dioptric gradient) between the treated and untreated cornea. This is achieved by first treating the cylinder and making the corneal surface spherical and then ablating the spherical component of the refractive error.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
VINCIGUERRA_Photorefractive.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 3.45 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.45 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11699/6520
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact