Artificial intelligence has been shown to be effective in polyp detection, and multiple computer-aided detection (CADe) systems have been developed. False-positive (FP) activation emerged as a possible way to benchmark CADe performance in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to validate a previously developed classification of FPs comparing the performances of different brands of approved CADe systems.
Comparing the number and relevance of false activations between 2 artificial intelligence computer-aided detection systems: the NOISE study
Hassan, Cesare;Maselli, Roberta;Carrara, Silvia;Repici, Alessandro
2022-01-01
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has been shown to be effective in polyp detection, and multiple computer-aided detection (CADe) systems have been developed. False-positive (FP) activation emerged as a possible way to benchmark CADe performance in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to validate a previously developed classification of FPs comparing the performances of different brands of approved CADe systems.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S0016510721019453-main.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
676.8 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
676.8 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
