It is still debated if benefits associated with radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are due to the access site selection itself, operator expertise or other underlying mechanisms.

Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Chiarito, Mauro;Cao, Davide;Stefanini, Giulio G;
2021

Abstract

It is still debated if benefits associated with radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are due to the access site selection itself, operator expertise or other underlying mechanisms.
bleeding
femoral access
percutaneous coronary intervention
radial access
Femoral Artery
Humans
Radial Artery
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Catheterization, Peripheral
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11699/69693
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact