Objective: the purpose of this study was to assess residual neck nodes after Chemo-Radiotherapy (CRT) using diffusion and T2 weighted imaging. Methods: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and T2 signal intensity were retrospectively analyzed in 45 residual nodes 8 weeks after the end of CRT. Sensitivity, specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values (PPV, NPV) and accuracy of diffusion and T2 weighted sequences were calculated. In a subgroup of 25 patients ADC and T2 signal intensity were compared to Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT) results. Histopathology and a 24 months follow-up after CRT were used as reference standard. Results: T2 signal intensity showed an accuracy of 63%, a sensitivity of 73.3%, a specificity of 55.6%, a PPV of 53.8% and a NPV of 75%. ADC showed an accuracy of 71.1%, using a threshold of 1.25 10-3 mm2/s, a sensitivity of 52.6%, a specificity of 84.6%, a PPV of 71.4% and a NPV of 71%. The combination of T2 signal intensity and ADC showed an accuracy of 73.3%, a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 84.6%, a PPV of 60% and a NPV of 78.7%. In the subset of 25 patients we correlated ADC and T2 data with PET-CT data: the latter showed higher accuracy, sensitivity and NPV and lower specificity; the PPV was similar between the two methods. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that MRI, using diffusion and T2 weighted imaging, has high specificity in detecting post-CRT residual neck nodes but it has a lower accuracy, sensitivity and NPV than PET-CT.

MRI Evaluation using DWI and T2WI of Residual Lymph Nodes in Patients Affected by Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Chemo-radiotherapy

Spriano G;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Objective: the purpose of this study was to assess residual neck nodes after Chemo-Radiotherapy (CRT) using diffusion and T2 weighted imaging. Methods: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and T2 signal intensity were retrospectively analyzed in 45 residual nodes 8 weeks after the end of CRT. Sensitivity, specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values (PPV, NPV) and accuracy of diffusion and T2 weighted sequences were calculated. In a subgroup of 25 patients ADC and T2 signal intensity were compared to Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT) results. Histopathology and a 24 months follow-up after CRT were used as reference standard. Results: T2 signal intensity showed an accuracy of 63%, a sensitivity of 73.3%, a specificity of 55.6%, a PPV of 53.8% and a NPV of 75%. ADC showed an accuracy of 71.1%, using a threshold of 1.25 10-3 mm2/s, a sensitivity of 52.6%, a specificity of 84.6%, a PPV of 71.4% and a NPV of 71%. The combination of T2 signal intensity and ADC showed an accuracy of 73.3%, a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 84.6%, a PPV of 60% and a NPV of 78.7%. In the subset of 25 patients we correlated ADC and T2 data with PET-CT data: the latter showed higher accuracy, sensitivity and NPV and lower specificity; the PPV was similar between the two methods. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that MRI, using diffusion and T2 weighted imaging, has high specificity in detecting post-CRT residual neck nodes but it has a lower accuracy, sensitivity and NPV than PET-CT.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11699/7243
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact