AIMS: To investigate the influence of cardiovascular risk factors (CV-RFs) on infarct severity and post-infarction left ventricular (LV) remodelling in acutely reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients studied with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).METHODS AND RESULTS: Four-hundred seventy-one patients were included in the study. Baseline CMR was performed at 4 ± 1 days after STEMI to assess area-at-risk, infarct size (IS), myocardial salvage index (MSI), microvascular obstruction (MVO), intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH), LV volumes, and function. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was repeated 4 months after STEMI (n = 383) to assess adverse LV remodelling (increase of LV end-diastolic volume >20% between baseline and follow-up). Smoking was associated with IMH at baseline even after correction for other factors associated with ischaemia-reperfusion injury including MVO, IS, and MSI (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.17-4.00, P = 0.01). Unexpectedly, smoking was an independent protective predictor against adverse LV remodelling (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.77, P = 0.005), consistent with the 'smoker's paradox'. However, the presence of IMH at baseline abolished the paradoxical, beneficial effects of smoking with respect to IS, baseline LV function, and post-infarction LV remodelling. No association between other CV-RFs, infarct severity, or post-infarction LV remodelling was observed.CONCLUSION: In patients with reperfused STEMI, smoking is strongly and independently associated with IMH at baseline. Nonetheless, consistent with the 'smoker's paradox', smoking was an independent predictor of more favourable post-infarction LV remodelling. However, the paradoxical beneficial effects of smoking were lost in patients with IMH.

Impact of active smoking on myocardial infarction severity in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: the smoker's paradox revisited

Francone, M.;
2016-01-01

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the influence of cardiovascular risk factors (CV-RFs) on infarct severity and post-infarction left ventricular (LV) remodelling in acutely reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients studied with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).METHODS AND RESULTS: Four-hundred seventy-one patients were included in the study. Baseline CMR was performed at 4 ± 1 days after STEMI to assess area-at-risk, infarct size (IS), myocardial salvage index (MSI), microvascular obstruction (MVO), intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH), LV volumes, and function. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was repeated 4 months after STEMI (n = 383) to assess adverse LV remodelling (increase of LV end-diastolic volume >20% between baseline and follow-up). Smoking was associated with IMH at baseline even after correction for other factors associated with ischaemia-reperfusion injury including MVO, IS, and MSI (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.17-4.00, P = 0.01). Unexpectedly, smoking was an independent protective predictor against adverse LV remodelling (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.77, P = 0.005), consistent with the 'smoker's paradox'. However, the presence of IMH at baseline abolished the paradoxical, beneficial effects of smoking with respect to IS, baseline LV function, and post-infarction LV remodelling. No association between other CV-RFs, infarct severity, or post-infarction LV remodelling was observed.CONCLUSION: In patients with reperfused STEMI, smoking is strongly and independently associated with IMH at baseline. Nonetheless, consistent with the 'smoker's paradox', smoking was an independent predictor of more favourable post-infarction LV remodelling. However, the paradoxical beneficial effects of smoking were lost in patients with IMH.
2016
cardiovascular risk factors
left ventricular remodelling
myocardial infarction
smoker's paradox
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11699/77928
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 50
social impact