An increasing amount of research explores the role of race in clinical phenotypes and outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to investigate racial differences in infliximab (IFX) treatment efficacy in UC. We used aggregate data from IFX trials and evidence synthesis methods to generate race-specific efficacy estimates. Then, we tested the effect modification by race by comparing the race-specific estimates derived from independent evidence syntheses. We computed ratios of relative risks (RRRs) and performed tests of statistical interaction. We analyzed data from five randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating IFX as induction and maintenance therapy for adults with moderate-to-severe UC (875 participants; 45% Asians). We found no substantial evidence of racial differences concerning the efficacy of IFX in inducing clinical response (RRR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.66–1.20; p = 0.44), clinical remission (RRR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.24–1.44; p = 0.24), and mucosal healing (RRR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.69–1.41; p = 0.95), or maintaining clinical remission (RRR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.46–1.42; p = 0.45) and mucosal healing (RRR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.48–1.46; p = 0.53), between Asian and Caucasian populations. Future clinical studies should expand the participation of racial minorities to comprehensively assess potential racial differences in the effectiveness of advanced therapies, including IFX, in the context of treating UC.
Racial Disparities in Infliximab Efficacy for Ulcerative Colitis: Evidence Synthesis and Effect Modification Assessment
Bonovas S.;Piovani D.
2024-01-01
Abstract
An increasing amount of research explores the role of race in clinical phenotypes and outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to investigate racial differences in infliximab (IFX) treatment efficacy in UC. We used aggregate data from IFX trials and evidence synthesis methods to generate race-specific efficacy estimates. Then, we tested the effect modification by race by comparing the race-specific estimates derived from independent evidence syntheses. We computed ratios of relative risks (RRRs) and performed tests of statistical interaction. We analyzed data from five randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating IFX as induction and maintenance therapy for adults with moderate-to-severe UC (875 participants; 45% Asians). We found no substantial evidence of racial differences concerning the efficacy of IFX in inducing clinical response (RRR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.66–1.20; p = 0.44), clinical remission (RRR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.24–1.44; p = 0.24), and mucosal healing (RRR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.69–1.41; p = 0.95), or maintaining clinical remission (RRR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.46–1.42; p = 0.45) and mucosal healing (RRR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.48–1.46; p = 0.53), between Asian and Caucasian populations. Future clinical studies should expand the participation of racial minorities to comprehensively assess potential racial differences in the effectiveness of advanced therapies, including IFX, in the context of treating UC.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.