To identify a clinical predictor score for difficult laryngeal exposure (DLE) during operative microlaryngoscopy.Prospective cohort study in two academic institutions.We evaluated 319 patients before microlaryngoscopy for benign and malignant glottic diseases by a standardized preoperative assessment protocol (Laryngoscore) that included 11 parameters: interincisors gap (IIG), thyro-mental distance, upper jaw dental status, trismus, mandibular prognathism, macroglossia, micrognathia, degree of neck flexion-extension, history of previous open-neck and/or radiotherapy, Mallampati's modified score, and body mass index (BMI). Each parameter was assessed to obtain a total score. Patients were divided into five classes according to the anterior commissure (AC) visualization: class 0, complete AC visualization with large-bore laryngoscopes in the Boyce-Jackson position; class I, as class 0 with external laryngeal counterpressure; class II, as class I in the flexion-flexion position; class III, as class II using small-bore laryngoscopes; and class IV, impossible AC visualization.Class 0-I-II (good/acceptable laryngeal exposure) presented a median score < 6. This value was chosen as cutoff for distinguishing favorable versus difficult/impossible laryngeal exposures. When the Laryngoscore was < 6, good laryngeal exposure was observed in 94\% of patients, whereas when ≥ 6, DLE was encountered in 40\%. When considering a Laryngoscore of ≥ 9, 67\% of patients had a DLE. At univariate analysis, IIG, upper jaw dental status, macroglossia, micrognathia, degree of neck flexion-extension, and BMI statistically impacted on DLE (P < 0.05).The Laryngoscore is a good predictor of DLE and assists in selecting the ideal candidates for operative microlaryngoscopy.2b. Laryngoscope, 124:2561-2567, 2014.

Preoperative clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure for microlaryngoscopy: The laryngoscore

PADERNO, ALBERTO;
2014-01-01

Abstract

To identify a clinical predictor score for difficult laryngeal exposure (DLE) during operative microlaryngoscopy.Prospective cohort study in two academic institutions.We evaluated 319 patients before microlaryngoscopy for benign and malignant glottic diseases by a standardized preoperative assessment protocol (Laryngoscore) that included 11 parameters: interincisors gap (IIG), thyro-mental distance, upper jaw dental status, trismus, mandibular prognathism, macroglossia, micrognathia, degree of neck flexion-extension, history of previous open-neck and/or radiotherapy, Mallampati's modified score, and body mass index (BMI). Each parameter was assessed to obtain a total score. Patients were divided into five classes according to the anterior commissure (AC) visualization: class 0, complete AC visualization with large-bore laryngoscopes in the Boyce-Jackson position; class I, as class 0 with external laryngeal counterpressure; class II, as class I in the flexion-flexion position; class III, as class II using small-bore laryngoscopes; and class IV, impossible AC visualization.Class 0-I-II (good/acceptable laryngeal exposure) presented a median score < 6. This value was chosen as cutoff for distinguishing favorable versus difficult/impossible laryngeal exposures. When the Laryngoscore was < 6, good laryngeal exposure was observed in 94\% of patients, whereas when ≥ 6, DLE was encountered in 40\%. When considering a Laryngoscore of ≥ 9, 67\% of patients had a DLE. At univariate analysis, IIG, upper jaw dental status, macroglossia, micrognathia, degree of neck flexion-extension, and BMI statistically impacted on DLE (P < 0.05).The Laryngoscore is a good predictor of DLE and assists in selecting the ideal candidates for operative microlaryngoscopy.2b. Laryngoscope, 124:2561-2567, 2014.
2014
Difficult laryngeal exposure
microlaryngoscopy
transoral microsurgery
glottic tumor
benign glottic lesions
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11699/83364
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 83
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 69
social impact