Lynch Syndrome: From Multidisciplinary Management to Precision Prevention

Simple Summary Lynch syndrome (LS) stands as the predominant inherited cancer condition at present. Currently, surveillance is based on genotype-driven strategies and mostly comprises both invasive and non-invasive medical assessments for early diagnosis. Effective preventive strategies for interrupting the biological sequence of cancer development are yet to be established. Recent findings from randomized controlled trials indicate potential preventive functions of resistant starch and/or aspirin in Lynch syndrome. The use of immunogenic frameshift peptides for vaccination appears to be a promising approach for both treating and preventing Lynch syndrome-associated cancers, based on pre-clinical and early phase 1/2a studies.Abstract Background and Aims: Lynch syndrome (LS) is currently one of the most prevalent hereditary cancer conditions, accounting for 3% of all colorectal cancers and for up to 15% of those with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, and it was one of the first historically identified. The understanding of the molecular carcinogenesis of LS tumors has progressed significantly in recent years. We aim to review the most recent advances in LS research and explore genotype-based approaches in surveillance, personalized cancer prevention, and treatment strategies. Methods: PubMed was searched to identify relevant studies, conducted up to December 2023, investigating molecular carcinogenesis in LS, surveillance strategies, cancer prevention, and treatment in LS tumors. Results: Multigene panel sequencing is becoming the benchmark in the diagnosis of LS, allowing for the detection of a pathogenic constitutional variant in one of the MMR genes. Emerging data from randomized controlled trials suggest possible preventive roles of resistant starch and/or aspirin in LS. Vaccination with immunogenic frameshift peptides appears to be a promising approach for both the treatment and prevention of LS-associated cancers, as evidenced by pre-clinical and preliminary phase 1/2a studies. Conclusions: Although robust diagnostic algorithms, including prompt testing of tumor tissue for MMR defects and referral for genetic counselling, currently exist for suspected LS in CRC patients, the indications for LS screening in cancer-free individuals still need to be refined and standardized. Investigation into additional genetic and non-genetic factors that may explain residual rates of interval cancers, even in properly screened populations, would allow for more tailored preventive strategies.