PURPOSE: To develop a system for the examination of the ablated surface after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to correlate the surface regularity to the functional outcome. METHODS: A Nidek Eas-1000 Anterior Eye Segment Analysis System was used to examine the ablated surface or the interface regularity immediately after PRK and LASIK. Eighty eyes were evaluated and divided into three study groups: group 1; regularity (18 eyes), group 2; mild irregularity (32 eyes), group 3; severe irregularity (30 eyes). RESULTS: At 12 months postoperatively, group 1 (regularity) showed the best percentage of eyes with 0 haze (100%) and with a refraction ±1.00 D of plano (89%); group 2 (mild irregularity) 84% had 0 haze and 62% were ± 1.00 D of plano; group 3 (severe irregularity) 27% had 0 haze and 47% were ± 1.00 D of plano. CONCLUSION: The patients with no postoperative irregularity had a sharply lower incidence of haze and a better refractive outcome with respect to plano, confirming the influence of ablation regularity on the results and the importance of this analysis in clinical practice

A method for examining surface and interface irregularities after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in site keratomileusis: Predictor of optical and functional outcomes

Vinciguerra P;
1998

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a system for the examination of the ablated surface after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to correlate the surface regularity to the functional outcome. METHODS: A Nidek Eas-1000 Anterior Eye Segment Analysis System was used to examine the ablated surface or the interface regularity immediately after PRK and LASIK. Eighty eyes were evaluated and divided into three study groups: group 1; regularity (18 eyes), group 2; mild irregularity (32 eyes), group 3; severe irregularity (30 eyes). RESULTS: At 12 months postoperatively, group 1 (regularity) showed the best percentage of eyes with 0 haze (100%) and with a refraction ±1.00 D of plano (89%); group 2 (mild irregularity) 84% had 0 haze and 62% were ± 1.00 D of plano; group 3 (severe irregularity) 27% had 0 haze and 47% were ± 1.00 D of plano. CONCLUSION: The patients with no postoperative irregularity had a sharply lower incidence of haze and a better refractive outcome with respect to plano, confirming the influence of ablation regularity on the results and the importance of this analysis in clinical practice
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
VINCIGUERRA_A method.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 1.93 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.93 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11699/9433
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 61
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact