RationaleSulcus implantation of intraocular lenses (IOLs) is an essential strategy when capsular support is inadequate or postoperative refractive correction is required. Evidence on safety, design considerations, and clinical outcomes is extensive but heterogeneous.ObjectivesTo synthesise current evidence on indications, visual outcomes, and complication profiles of sulcus-implanted IOLs, and to highlight design-dependent factors influencing predictability and safety.MethodsA narrative review was conducted using PubMed and manual reference screening. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of sulcus-positioned IOLs-including three-piece lenses, supplementary/add-on lenses, and sulcus-placed primary IOLs-were included. Numerical values are presented as reported, without standardised pooling or comparative analysis.ResultsFifty studies met the inclusion criteria. Across indications such as aphakia, zonular weakness, IOL dislocation, capsular rupture, and refractive enhancement, postoperative visual acuity was generally stable, with mean improvements commonly ranging from 0.10 to 0.30 logMAR in appropriately selected cases. Complications varied substantially by IOL design. Three-piece lenses showed low rates of cystoid macular oedema (1-8%), pigment dispersion (0-12%), and intraocular pressure elevation (1-9%). In contrast, single-piece acrylic lenses demonstrated consistently higher risk of uveal chafing, pigment dispersion, intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation, and uveitis-glaucoma-hyphaema (UGH) syndrome. Purpose-designed sulcus and add-on lenses demonstrated good centration, low decentration or tilt, and predictable reversibility. Endothelial safety was generally comparable to standard cataract surgery when sulcus-appropriate designs were used.ConclusionsSulcus implantation is a versatile and reliable option when the capsular bag is compromised or supplementary correction is required. Outcomes and safety are strongly design-dependent, with three-piece and sulcus-specific add-on lenses showing the most favourable profiles. Further prospective studies are needed to refine long-term risk assessment and design-based recommendations.
Advances and Challenges in Sulcus-Implanted Intraocular Lenses: A Comprehensive Narrative Review
Romano, Mario;
2026-01-01
Abstract
RationaleSulcus implantation of intraocular lenses (IOLs) is an essential strategy when capsular support is inadequate or postoperative refractive correction is required. Evidence on safety, design considerations, and clinical outcomes is extensive but heterogeneous.ObjectivesTo synthesise current evidence on indications, visual outcomes, and complication profiles of sulcus-implanted IOLs, and to highlight design-dependent factors influencing predictability and safety.MethodsA narrative review was conducted using PubMed and manual reference screening. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of sulcus-positioned IOLs-including three-piece lenses, supplementary/add-on lenses, and sulcus-placed primary IOLs-were included. Numerical values are presented as reported, without standardised pooling or comparative analysis.ResultsFifty studies met the inclusion criteria. Across indications such as aphakia, zonular weakness, IOL dislocation, capsular rupture, and refractive enhancement, postoperative visual acuity was generally stable, with mean improvements commonly ranging from 0.10 to 0.30 logMAR in appropriately selected cases. Complications varied substantially by IOL design. Three-piece lenses showed low rates of cystoid macular oedema (1-8%), pigment dispersion (0-12%), and intraocular pressure elevation (1-9%). In contrast, single-piece acrylic lenses demonstrated consistently higher risk of uveal chafing, pigment dispersion, intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation, and uveitis-glaucoma-hyphaema (UGH) syndrome. Purpose-designed sulcus and add-on lenses demonstrated good centration, low decentration or tilt, and predictable reversibility. Endothelial safety was generally comparable to standard cataract surgery when sulcus-appropriate designs were used.ConclusionsSulcus implantation is a versatile and reliable option when the capsular bag is compromised or supplementary correction is required. Outcomes and safety are strongly design-dependent, with three-piece and sulcus-specific add-on lenses showing the most favourable profiles. Further prospective studies are needed to refine long-term risk assessment and design-based recommendations.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
