Aim: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the "cross-cylinder" technique in the correction of astigmatism. Setting and Design: A prospective interventional study from a university eye department was conducted. Material and Methods: The photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) using the "cross-cylinder" technique was performed in 102 eyes of 84 patients with at least 0.75 D of astigmatism. The study population was divided into two groups: in the first group the preoperative astigmatic power ranged from -0.75 D to -3.00 D (group 1), in the second group it ranged from -3.25 D to -6.00 D (group 2). Group 1 included 82 eyes of 67 patients (29 males and 38 females) with a mean cylinder power of -1.90 +/- 0.63 D, group 2 included 20 eyes of 17 patients (13 males and 4 females) with a mean cylinder power of -4.28 +/- 0.76 D. All eyes were targeted for emmetropia. The results were evaluated using Calossi's vector analysis method. Six-month postoperative outcomes are presented. Results: Six months after PARK the mean sphere for the entire cohort was +0.28 +/- 0.75 D (range +2.5 to -2 D), the mean cylindrical power was +0.33 +/- 0.51 D (range +2.5 to -1.25 D) and the mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.73 +/- 0.81 D (range +1.75 to -2 D). Conclusions: The cross-cylinder technique may be safely used with predictable results for the correction of astigmatism.

Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation

Mario R. Romano;
2012

Abstract

Aim: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the "cross-cylinder" technique in the correction of astigmatism. Setting and Design: A prospective interventional study from a university eye department was conducted. Material and Methods: The photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) using the "cross-cylinder" technique was performed in 102 eyes of 84 patients with at least 0.75 D of astigmatism. The study population was divided into two groups: in the first group the preoperative astigmatic power ranged from -0.75 D to -3.00 D (group 1), in the second group it ranged from -3.25 D to -6.00 D (group 2). Group 1 included 82 eyes of 67 patients (29 males and 38 females) with a mean cylinder power of -1.90 +/- 0.63 D, group 2 included 20 eyes of 17 patients (13 males and 4 females) with a mean cylinder power of -4.28 +/- 0.76 D. All eyes were targeted for emmetropia. The results were evaluated using Calossi's vector analysis method. Six-month postoperative outcomes are presented. Results: Six months after PARK the mean sphere for the entire cohort was +0.28 +/- 0.75 D (range +2.5 to -2 D), the mean cylindrical power was +0.33 +/- 0.51 D (range +2.5 to -1.25 D) and the mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.73 +/- 0.81 D (range +1.75 to -2 D). Conclusions: The cross-cylinder technique may be safely used with predictable results for the correction of astigmatism.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11699/1486
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact