Surgical management of an idiopathic macular hole consists of vitrectomy to release vitreofoveal traction and intraocular tamponade to flatten and reappose the hole's edges. The intentional atraumatic removal of the internal limiting membrane has been proposed as cost-effective option in macular hole surgery. The internal limiting membrane contributes to tangential traction at the edges of the hole and acts as a platform on which glial cells proliferate. Removal of the internal limiting membrane increases the elasticity of the denuded macula and improves the anatomical success rate; however, the visual consequences of this surgical maneuver are still not fully known. We discuss the beneficial and adverse effects associated with internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery, highlighting the internal limiting membrane's role in macular hole etiology and pathogenesis and the anatomical and functional findings after its removal. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Controversies over the role of internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy in macular hole surgery

Mario R. Romano;
2017

Abstract

Surgical management of an idiopathic macular hole consists of vitrectomy to release vitreofoveal traction and intraocular tamponade to flatten and reappose the hole's edges. The intentional atraumatic removal of the internal limiting membrane has been proposed as cost-effective option in macular hole surgery. The internal limiting membrane contributes to tangential traction at the edges of the hole and acts as a platform on which glial cells proliferate. Removal of the internal limiting membrane increases the elasticity of the denuded macula and improves the anatomical success rate; however, the visual consequences of this surgical maneuver are still not fully known. We discuss the beneficial and adverse effects associated with internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery, highlighting the internal limiting membrane's role in macular hole etiology and pathogenesis and the anatomical and functional findings after its removal. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Survey 2016.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 604.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
604.01 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11699/4178
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 39
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact