: The primary repair of full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) through pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and gas tamponade is the current standard of practice and offers a high closure rate of approximately 90%. On the contrary, the surgical management of refractory (or persistent) and recurrent FTMHs is still a challenging and controversial topic in vitreoretinal surgery as multiple options have been suggested, particularly over the last few years, with no consensus regarding any appropriate selection criteria or the best surgical option. Moreover, the presence of various case series / interventional studies presenting comparable outcomes, as well as the absence of studies with a direct comparison of different surgical techniques, may result in confusion. We provide a structured and comprehensive overview of the different surgical options currently available for the secondary repair of refractory and recurrent FTMHs. In addition to an update on epidemiology, diagnosis and description of the surgical steps, we highlight the evidence available to support each of the described surgical techniques, specifically focusing on the presumed mechanisms of hole closure, advantages and known prognostic factors.
Management of refractory and recurrent macular holes: A comprehensive review
Romano, Mario;
2022-01-01
Abstract
: The primary repair of full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) through pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and gas tamponade is the current standard of practice and offers a high closure rate of approximately 90%. On the contrary, the surgical management of refractory (or persistent) and recurrent FTMHs is still a challenging and controversial topic in vitreoretinal surgery as multiple options have been suggested, particularly over the last few years, with no consensus regarding any appropriate selection criteria or the best surgical option. Moreover, the presence of various case series / interventional studies presenting comparable outcomes, as well as the absence of studies with a direct comparison of different surgical techniques, may result in confusion. We provide a structured and comprehensive overview of the different surgical options currently available for the secondary repair of refractory and recurrent FTMHs. In addition to an update on epidemiology, diagnosis and description of the surgical steps, we highlight the evidence available to support each of the described surgical techniques, specifically focusing on the presumed mechanisms of hole closure, advantages and known prognostic factors.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
